Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 198 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 51 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 13.6 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 24 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`427 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |