Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 engine produces 7 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, but torque is 10 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 14.9 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 14 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2047 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`359 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`752 kg | 2`092 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 607 kg | 658 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. Therefore, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |