Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 227 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 394 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 engine produces 16 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993, but torque is 6 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 15.7 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 1136 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 2254 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 (by 207 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2003 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |