Jeep Grand Cherokee 1996 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Blazer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 2 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 2.09 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 10 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 29 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1136 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2254 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 767 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |