Jeep Grand Cherokee 1994 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 3 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 42 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 15.3 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1994 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 21 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |