Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1998

 
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 - 1993
Land Rover Range Rover
1998 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.0 Petrol4.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 193 HP185 HP
Torque: 305 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 seconds12.2 seconds
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive.
Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 8 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 35 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.815.3
Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 87 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway860 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 20 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep WranglerUsed also on Land Rover Discovery
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect.
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.71 m
Width: 1.76 m1.89 m
Height: 1.65 m1.82 m
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller.
Jeep Grand Cherokee is 21 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 17 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover.
Gross weight (kg): no data3`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 50004200
Rating in user reviews: 8.2/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv