Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, but torque is 33 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 14.3 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 14 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |