Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.5 - 5.9 | 2.7 - 3.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 237 HP | 125 - 185 HP | |
Torque: | 278 - 472 NM | 240 - 295 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13 seconds | 10.1 - 14.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 17.9 | 11.2 - 16.0 | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1136 litres | 1263 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2255 litres | 2257 litres | |
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 127 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 2 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`410 | ~ 2`392 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |