Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.5 - 5.9 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 - 4.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 237 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
Torque: | 278 - 472 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13 seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 17.9 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 12 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1136 litres | 1903 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2255 litres | 1920 litres | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has 767 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 335 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`410 | ~ 2`196 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |