Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Pajero can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.7 | 3.0 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 258 HP | 165 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 - 425 NM | 261 - 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 14 seconds | 10.2 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 16.5 | 8.7 - 13.5 | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 29 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1790 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 889 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`447 | ~ 3`024 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |