Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.1 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 - 425 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 - 570 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 10.7 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| In general, Jeep Grand Cherokee are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo XC90. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 16.4 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 178 - 204 mm (7 - 8 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1909 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 72 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`750 kg | ~ 2`735 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`130 kg | ~ 2`080 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 620 kg | ~ 655 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |