Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Mercedes ML 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.1 | 3.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 - 425 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 - 570 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 10.7 seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| In general, Mercedes ML are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 16.4 | 9.4 - 16.0 | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1909 litres | 2050 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mercedes ML may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 141 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`750 kg | ~ 2`854 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`130 kg | ~ 2`156 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 620 kg | ~ 698 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |