Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Jeep Commander 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Commander can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Commander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.1 | 3.0 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 - 425 HP | 213 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 - 570 NM | 319 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 10.7 seconds | 7.4 - 9.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 16.4 | 10.8 - 15.5 | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Commander. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1909 litres | 1950 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Jeep Commander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jeep Commander, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`750 kg | ~ 3`186 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`130 kg | ~ 2`215 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 620 kg | ~ 971 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 57 procentiem less than Jeep Commander. Therefore, Jeep Commander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |