Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Mercedes ML 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.4 | 3.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 - 468 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 - 630 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 9.1 seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 14.1 | 8.4 - 16.5 | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 994 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 443 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`949 | ~ 2`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |