Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.4 | 3.0 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 - 468 HP | 241 - 468 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 - 624 NM | 347 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 8.3 seconds | 4.8 - 9.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 14.7 | 8.3 - 14.1 | |
|
On average, the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 211 - 218 mm (8.3 - 8.6 inches) | 211 - 218 mm (8.3 - 8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 994 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 has 212 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`948 | ~ 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |