Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes ML can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.4 | 2.1 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 - 468 HP | 204 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 - 624 NM | 370 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 8.3 seconds | 5.6 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 14.7 | 6.2 - 11.5 | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 2010 litres | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has 92 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 456 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`948 kg | ~ 2`920 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`281 kg | ~ 2`164 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 667 kg | ~ 756 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |