Jeep Compass 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.0 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eleven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 18 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 328 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1269 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 167 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |