Jeep Cherokee 1991 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 208 HP | |
Torque: | 296 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 23 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 14.5 | |
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.90 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is 48 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 27 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |