Jeep Cherokee 1989 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Cherokee) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 296 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 60 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 7.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 12.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.4 l/100km | 13.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 460 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.88 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 46 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |