Jeep Cherokee 1989 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1985

 
Jeep Cherokee
1989 - 1995
Toyota Land Cruiser
1985 - 1990
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 4.0 Petrol4.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 185 HP136 HP
Torque: 296 NM315 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds17.5 seconds
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive.
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 49 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 19 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.810.5
Real fuel consumption: 16.4 l/100km12.2 l/100km
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 345 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres90 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
460 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.75 m
Width: 1.79 m1.88 m
Height: 1.63 m1.84 m
Jeep Cherokee is smaller.
Jeep Cherokee is 51 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 21 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters13.4 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 2.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5003`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 44009400
Pros and Cons: Jeep Cherokee has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv