Jeep Cherokee 1989 vs Lada NIVA (2121) 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 296 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 19 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 105 HP more power than Lada NIVA (2121), whereas torque is 168 NM more than Lada NIVA (2121). Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 9.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.4 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Lada NIVA (2121) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lada NIVA (2121), which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lada NIVA (2121). | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 410 km in combined cycle | |
| 460 km with real consumption | 400 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Cherokee is 50 cm longer than the Lada NIVA (2121), 11 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Lada NIVA (2121) has
| |