Jeep Cherokee 1995 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 6 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 13.7 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 40 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |