Jeep Cherokee 1995 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 12.4 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.88 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 46 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |