Jeep Cherokee 1995 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1995

 
Jeep Cherokee
1995 - 1997
Toyota Land Cruiser
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel4.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 116 HP170 HP
Torque: 262 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds12.7 seconds
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 54 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.111.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km12.6 l/100km
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres95 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
790 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km630'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler VoyagerUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.84 m
Width: 1.79 m1.93 m
Height: 1.62 m1.91 m
Jeep Cherokee is smaller.
Jeep Cherokee is 60 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 29 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data832 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1368 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5003`060
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 500011 200
Pros and Cons: Jeep Cherokee has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv