Jeep Cherokee 1995 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 22 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 26 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 9.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 11.8 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 25 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |