Jeep Cherokee 1995 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1989

 
Jeep Cherokee
1995 - 1997
Land Rover Range Rover
1989 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP121 HP
Torque: 262 NM284 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds19.5 seconds
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 5 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.110.3
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km11.5 l/100km
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
790 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.48 m
Width: 1.79 m1.82 m
Height: 1.62 m1.81 m
Jeep Cherokee is smaller.
Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5003`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 52009800
Pros and Cons: Jeep Cherokee has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv