Jeep Cherokee 1995 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 4 HP less power than Isuzu Rodeo, but torque is 58 NM more than Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 12.0 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Rodeo, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Isuzu Rodeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm shorter than the Isuzu Rodeo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`066 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |