Jeep Cherokee 1989 vs Lada NIVA (2121) 1993
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 87 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 184 NM | 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22.3 seconds | 25 seconds | |
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 23 HP more power than Lada NIVA (2121), whereas torque is 66 NM more than Lada NIVA (2121). Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.7 | |
The Lada NIVA (2121) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lada NIVA (2121), which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 3.74 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Cherokee is 50 cm longer than the Lada NIVA (2121), 11 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Lada NIVA (2121) has
| |