Jeep Cherokee 1989 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 33 HP less power than Isuzu Rodeo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 12.0 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Rodeo, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm shorter than the Isuzu Rodeo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`066 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |