Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 14.3 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 29 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.90 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 47 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1011 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2033 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |