Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 301 NM | 298 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 22 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 15.6 | |
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 95 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.25 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.87 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 53 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1011 litres | 830 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2033 litres | 1370 litres | |
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 181 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 663 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`960 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |