Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 301 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 12 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 14.3 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 39 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1011 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2033 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Jeep Cherokee has 892 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |