Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 75 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 145 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 17.3 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 6.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 430 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |