Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 61 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.7 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 39 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | 1076 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | 2407 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 144 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 453 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | 2`404 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |