Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 266 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 42 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 13.9 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 79 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 39 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |