Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, but torque is 40 NM more than Mazda Tribute. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 17.3 l/100km | 14.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| 430 km with real consumption | 430 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda Tribute, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | 2245 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 475 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The Mazda Tribute may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 291 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |