Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 9 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 22 NM more than Lexus RX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 13.0 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 33 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | 1725 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 443 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. The Lexus RX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Lexus RX has
| |