Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 2 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, but torque is 33 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 14.3 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 39 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 932 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1954 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Jeep Cherokee has 971 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 34 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`223 | 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |