Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 40 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.9 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 965 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2010 litres | 1080 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 707 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 930 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`105 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |