Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 12.5 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.90 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 45 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |