Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 7 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 33 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1315 litres | 828 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 394 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 487 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`230 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`630 kg | 1`200 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 400 kg | |
| Jeep Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Therefore, Jeep Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |