Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 12 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 126 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 33 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | 828 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |