Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Cherokee) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda Tribute) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 81 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, but torque is 35 NM more than Mazda Tribute. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 14.3 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 430 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda Tribute, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | 2245 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 195 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The Mazda Tribute may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 930 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |