Jeep Cherokee 1997 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 30 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 46 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |