Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 318 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 9 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 14.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.1 l/100km | 15.7 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 29 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Cherokee is 36 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |