Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 64 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 137 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.1 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 705 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 490 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 9 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 374 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 446 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 1280 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |