Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Mazda Tribute 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 61 HP more power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 119 NM more than Mazda Tribute. Despite the higher power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.1 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Tribute is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 630 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm longer than the Mazda Tribute, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 2245 litres | |
| Jeep Cherokee has 452 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |