Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Toyota RAV4 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 24 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 420 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 800 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |