Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 13 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Cherokee is 17 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 284 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |