Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 54 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 45 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`540 kg | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |